| ... | @@ -9,4 +9,10 @@ Tasks: |
... | @@ -9,4 +9,10 @@ Tasks: |
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
- check list of the references in the paper and suggest reviewers considering the authors of referenced papers as candidates
|
|
- check list of the references in the paper and suggest reviewers considering the authors of referenced papers as candidates
|
|
|
- for each referenced paper: rank authors -- students, phd-students, research advisors, who is the main author, qualification of the authors, etc
|
|
- for each referenced paper: rank authors -- students, phd-students, research advisors, who is the main author, qualification of the authors, etc
|
|
|
- automatically invite all the authors of all the referenced papers to give their opinion on the paper and check how their paper is referenced and explained in the paper |
|
- automatically invite all the authors of all the referenced papers to give their opinion on the paper and check how their paper is referenced and explained in the paper
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
|
- Analysis of highly influential papers
|
|
|
|
- find papers with relatively high number of citations
|
|
|
|
- track papers of the same authors related to such papers in order to see how their ideas developed
|
|
|
|
- find projects, data, software tools related to such publications
|
|
|
|
- among the citing papers: find groups of good papers with solid results that really develops the ideas and trash papers that just use the success of the cited paper
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
